Overview
As the Philippines recorded strong GDP growth rates towards a trajectory to become an upper middle-income country prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, poverty rates were on a downward trend.
Income poverty exacerbates conditions for children to achieve their full potential and in many ways are also viewed as underlying causes for a child to access and utilize adequate health, nutrition and education services. Families may also be more dependent on their children to support household income leading to children engaging in economic activities that impedes their right to education, as well as exposing them to increased risk of abuse and exploitation.
The 2020-2021 pandemic bore down hard on the country’s people and resources pushing poverty up again and setting back progress in reducing poverty. As the economy continues to recover poverty reduction starts to get back on track.
Child Rights Situation Analysis
The indicators presented here include the poverty incidence among the population and among children, subsistence incidence among the population and among children, magnitude of poor and subsistence poor population and children, and unemployment rate and unemployed persons, including youth not in employment, education and training.
The proportion of children living in poverty is measured as the proportion of children belonging to poor families with per capita income less than the per capita poverty threshold to the total number of children. The proportion of children living in food poverty (incidence of subsistence) is measured as the proportion of children belonging to poor families with per capita income less than the per capita food threshold to the total number of children.
Poverty incidence among the population gets back down to 15.5 per cent in 2023 after increasing to 18.1 per cent through the pandemic in 2021. The latest estimate even improves on the 16.7 per cent poverty rate posted in 2018. The decline in poverty incidence has lifted about 500 thousand families or 2.36 million people out of poverty between 2021 and 2023. However, there is still over 17.5 million Filipinos or 3 million families who did not have enough income to satisfy their basic food and non-food needs.
There are 1.7 million less 'food poor' individuals in 2023 but the rest remains sizable. The proportion of the population whose incomes were not sufficient to meet their basic food needs has dropped to 4.3 per cent in 2023 from 5.9 per cent in 2021. This equates to 1.7 million less food poor Filipinos but leaves at least 4.8 million still living below subsistence. Among families, 2.7 percent or some 740 thousand remain unable to earn enough income to meet their families' basic food requirements.
Notably, while there was a remarkable decline in poverty incidence from 61.8 per cent in 2018 to 37.2 per cent in 2021, a 25 percentage-point difference, BARMM remains the region with the highest proportion of poor population in the country. The decline in poverty incidence was observed across all provinces in the regions except in Tawi-tawi, and albeit unevenly. Some analysis pointed to growth in seasonal wages and farm incomes as well as large government transfers especially during the pandemic contributing to the reduction of poverty in BARMM. The other regions with the highest poverty incidence are Caraga with 33.2 per cent, Region IX at 30.1 per cent, and Region V with 29.3 per cent. Among regions with increased poverty incidence, Region VII had the largest jump from 17.7 per cent in 2018 to 27.6 per cent in 2021.
Among the poor population are children, lots of them. In 2021, nearly three in every ten children are living in poverty. The proportion of children belonging to poor families (those with per capita income below the per capita poverty threshold) in 2021 was estimated at 26.4 per cent of all children in the country, up from 23.9 per cent in 2018. The estimated number of children who are considered poor rose to 10.5 million children in 2021 from 9.3 million poor children in 2018.
Eleven regions saw increased percentages of poor children with Region VII having the highest increase of 12.1 percentage-points. BARMM, despite having the sharpest decline in child poverty, by 23.1 percentage-points, still had the highest incidence in 2021 with at least four in every ten children or 44.2 per cent living in poverty.
Caraga region had almost the same proportion, 44.1 per cent, of poor children in 2021. Other regions with significantly high poverty rates among children are Regions V with 39.9 per cent, Region VIII at 39 per cent, and Region IX with 38.1 per cent. NCR had the least incidence of child poverty in the country.
Some 3.7 million children do not meet even the basic food needs in 2021, 578 thousand more ‘food poor’ children than in 2018. Subsistence incidence among children was estimated at 9.4 per cent of all children in 2021, up from 8.1 per cent in 2018. The regions with the highest proportion of children living in food poverty in 2021 were Caraga with 18. 8 per cent, and Regions IX and XII with similar 17.4 per cent. Although BARMM had the largest decline, by 18.3 percentage-points, subsistence incidence stayed well above the national average at 16.2 per cent. CAR registered the lowest incidence of food poverty among children at 3.4 per cent.
More than a third of the unemployed population are youth with unemployment rate estimated at 11.4 per cent in 2023, a small increase from 11.2 per cent in 2022. The number of unemployed adolescents and young people aged 15-24 years (or those belonging to the youth population persons) was estimated at 785 thousand in 2023 which constitute 37.5 per cent of the total unemployed population in the country for that year. These figures are higher than the number and share of unemployed youth in 2022 at 775 thousand or 34.6 per cent of the total.
On the other hand, the number of unemployed persons aged 15 years and older drops from over 2.2 million in 2022 to around 2.1 million in 2023, a 6.7 per cent decline. Overall, unemployment rate was measured at 4.3 per cent down from 5.4 per cent in 2022.
At least one in every ten adolescents and young are not in employment, education, or training in 2023. The percentage of youth not in employment, education, or training (NEET) was estimated at 11.7 per cent in 2023 which was equivalent to some 1.6 million young people, a little less than the estimated 1.5 million the year prior. Youth NEET refer to unemployed non-students (not studying and looking for work but could not find work) and inactive non-students (not studying but also not looking for work) aged between 15 and 24 years old.
Quick notes
- Child poverty rate up from 23.9% in 2018 to 26.4% in 2021.
- Poor children reach 10.5 million in 2021 up from 9.3 million in 2018; 3.7 million food poor children in 2021.
- BARMM's poor children reduced from 67.2% in 2018 to 44.2% in 2021 but still highest among regions.
- Highest increase in child poverty rate in Region VII, from 17.7% in 2018 to 27.6% in 2021.
- Poverty incidence among the population down from 18.1% in 2021 to 15.5% in 2023.
- Youth unemployment slightly up from 11.2% in 2022 to 11.4% in 2023; 785 thousand unemployed youth aged 15-24 years.
- Youth NEET number 1.6 million young people, 11.7% of youth population in 2023.
Equity & Risk
Equity
Vertical tabs block
Sex or gender-disaggregated data is unavailable for the indicator ‘Poverty Incidence Among Children’. For the poverty incidence among the general population, there is minimal difference in the figure for men at 18.5 per cent and women at 18.4 per cent, as of 2021.
Sex or gender-disaggregated data is unavailable for the indicator ‘Poverty Incidence Among Children’. For the poverty incidence among the general population, there is minimal difference in the figure for men at 18.5 per cent and women at 18.4 per cent, as of 2021.
Vertical tabs block
This situation analysis has not been able to determine any data which disaggregates by disability under this subdimension.
This situation analysis has not been able to determine any data which disaggregates by disability under this subdimension.
Vertical tabs block
Child poverty rate is highest in the BARMM at 44.2 per cent, significantly higher than the national average of 26.4 per cent. This is of significant concern, as child poverty generally results in inequitable progress for those affected with regard to child rights realization across a range of fields. Poverty can negatively impact children’s physical, social and emotional development, as well as increasing risk of school dropout as children are encouraged to generate income for the household.
Child poverty rate is highest in the BARMM at 44.2 per cent, significantly higher than the national average of 26.4 per cent. This is of significant concern, as child poverty generally results in inequitable progress for those affected with regard to child rights realization across a range of fields. Poverty can negatively impact children’s physical, social and emotional development, as well as increasing risk of school dropout as children are encouraged to generate income for the household.
Vertical tabs block
Age is a characteristic against which inequity is recorded with regard to unemployment rate. The share of those aged 15-24 years in the total unemployed population is relatively high at almost 40 percent. High youth unemployment can be detrimental to young people's social inclusion and well-being, and can result in some of them turning to crime to generate income and others turning to employment in the informal sector which can increase the risk of exploitation.
Age is a characteristic against which inequity is recorded with regard to unemployment rate. The share of those aged 15-24 years in the total unemployed population is relatively high at almost 40 percent. High youth unemployment can be detrimental to young people's social inclusion and well-being, and can result in some of them turning to crime to generate income and others turning to employment in the informal sector which can increase the risk of exploitation.
Risks
Vertical tabs block
No natural hazard-related risks were identified as yet under this subdimension.
No natural hazard-related risks were identified as yet under this subdimension.
Vertical tabs block
Geopolitical risks and conflict risks in Southeast Asia have the potential to affect government prioritization funding; this may be diverted from domestic agendas to defense. For example, tensions between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan could affect the Philippines if they grow into active conflict, which may result in the Filipino government investing more resources in defense, reducing the budget share of health, education and social protection.
Geopolitical risks and conflict risks in Southeast Asia have the potential to affect government prioritization funding; this may be diverted from domestic agendas to defense. For example, tensions between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan could affect the Philippines if they grow into active conflict, which may result in the Filipino government investing more resources in defense, reducing the budget share of health, education and social protection.
Vertical tabs block
It is noted that the situation on child poverty had been improving in the Philippines prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but that this event precipitated some declines in progress against key indicators. This indicates the risk to child poverty that future health pandemics could have in the Philippines.
It is noted that the situation on child poverty had been improving in the Philippines prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but that this event precipitated some declines in progress against key indicators. This indicates the risk to child poverty that future health pandemics could have in the Philippines.
Vertical tabs block
Changes to personnel and leadership within protection actors affect the delivery of social protection services in the Philippines. Each new senior official or representative appointed or elected may introduce new structures and priorities, which can make it challenging for INGOs and other partners to work effectively as they need to rebuild connections, networks and relationships, particularly for advocacy work and for training and capacitating new personnel on protection approaches. Leadership changes also affect the policy landscape regularly, with Congress, mayoral and LGU elections every three years, barangay elections every five years, and presidential elections every six years.
Changes to personnel and leadership within protection actors affect the delivery of social protection services in the Philippines. Each new senior official or representative appointed or elected may introduce new structures and priorities, which can make it challenging for INGOs and other partners to work effectively as they need to rebuild connections, networks and relationships, particularly for advocacy work and for training and capacitating new personnel on protection approaches. Leadership changes also affect the policy landscape regularly, with Congress, mayoral and LGU elections every three years, barangay elections every five years, and presidential elections every six years.
Quick notes
Legislation & Policy Analysis
Legal and policy provisions in the country have demonstrated commitment to addressing poverty in the country specifically for the overall population but not yet specific for children.
In 2020, Republic Act 11291, also known as the Magna Carta of the Poor, was enacted. The objective of the policy is that the state should uplift the “standard of living and quality of life for the poor and provide them with sustained opportunities for growth and development.”
Section 4 of the Act asserts the rights of all Filipinos regardless of wealth or any other determination, it lays out the key rights as follows: the right to adequate food; the right to decent work; the right to relevant and quality education; the right to adequate housing; and the right to the highest attainable standard of health.
While Republic Act 11291 is not child-specific, all determinations made under each of the declared rights (especially education) are relevant to child poverty. Conditions of poverty experienced by adults are vastly different from conditions that children face. Without the recognition of child poverty to be addressed to support socioeconomic development, breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty will inevitably be difficult to achieve.
In the Philippines, there is ongoing work to develop and adopt a Multidimensional Poverty Index. Using data from Demographic and Health Surveys, this aims to calculate an aggregated poverty score across three dimensions (health, education and living standards) and 10 indicators, helping to indicate poverty disparities and vulnerabilities.
The Philippine government has continued to budget for social protection initiatives; in 2023, the Department of Social Welfare and Development received PHP 151 billion to continue social protection service programs as reflected in Republic Act No. 11936.
At the local level, the Community-Based Monitoring System is critical for the targeting and development of local development planning. Other initiatives related to poverty and child poverty include ongoing work to tackle child labor, which is covered in detail in the Harmful Practices subdimension.
Bottleneck Analysis
- Unemployment within families. Unemployment stood at 5.4 per cent in 2022 which - while a significant reduction on the 2021 rate - remains a significant bottleneck causing household poverty for those affected.
- Limited access to technology. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, cash transfers are increasingly dispersed via mobile platforms such as GCash. Many families from low-income backgrounds either do not own a smartphone, have limited access to the internet, or have a low level of digital literacy. Together, these factors prove to be major bottlenecks. However, it is also important to note that there has been an increase in the ownership of e-money accounts from 8 per cent in 2019 to 36 per cent in 2021, which indicates that access to technology-based services is improving.
Lack of technical capacity among rural populations to carry out social development programs. These programs and activities rely heavily on local participation. While this is positive in improving the localization of social development initiatives, it has also been identified as a key bottleneck. Local populations are often engaged in the implementation of programs without being given the necessary skills and knowledge needed to effectively carry out their responsibilities, which leads to inefficiency.
- Limited capacity, inconsistent LCE willingness and leadership turnover at the subnational level. LGUs are the main duty bearers for the implementation of national laws and policies on social development. However, some LGUs suffer from a lack of capacity in terms of the human resources, technical skills and the necessary budgets for adequate implementation. A commonly cited bottleneck across KIIs was that decision-making on focus areas within LGUs relied heavily on the LCEs. As such, LCEs’ willingness, motivation, and ability to prioritize social development issues is a major determinant of the realization of an LGU’s prioritization of necessary service provision. While it is difficult to ascertain the extent of this bottleneck, it was suggested that LCEs often make decisions on these matters based on political factors rather than population needs. Furthermore, as LGU elections are held every three years, there are regular changes in health staff and leadership. This is a significant bottleneck, as knowledge and expertise around health and nutrition at LGU level fluctuates regularly. For partner organizations, this turnover also requires the rebuilding of relationships to carry forward collaborative endeavors.
- Insufficient budget for the Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) at the LGU level. The CBMS is a key mechanism throughout which social protection programs are targeted and monitored in the Philippines. However, it is noted that to date there has been insufficient budget for LGUs to effectively implement the CBMS at the local level.
Related Publications
Share Your Insights!
Your feedback is crucial in enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of our content. All feedback will be validated and evaluated by our content team and is subject to approval.